Broken Bits
Just as
capitalism has reduced everything in the world to a single type of value,
computers have reduced all information to binary bits. Everything a computer transmits has to be
stripped of any contextual value it had because of where, how and by whom it
was created so it can be shuffled through the internet and delivered without
context to your screen. As a result, we
have access to an almost unlimited amount of information, but none of it has
any meaning attached to it. This
presents us with a problem people have never faced before: how to construct a
world without context. In the past
information was sorted by the tribe, by the school, by the government or
church. Those institutions still exist,
and some people still use them to construct meaning, but the more common
experience is to be set adrift to drown in random and unconnected bits of
information.
On one
hand, this situation is liberating.
People don’t have to rely on the school, the government, or the church
to get their information about the world.
I don’t agree with folks who argue we should go back to an institutional
check on knowledge. I think the leveling
of knowledge is an important part of liberation. Going back to the old set up is to go back to
the old forms of oppression. On the
other hand, the overabundance of decontextualized information presents us with
a challenge people have never faced before, and we are ill equipped to deal
with it. Many people run back to their
tribe and use it block out anything that challenges that orthodoxy. The irony of having so much information is
that it is so overwhelming that the easy way out is to block it out and only
let in information that confirms what our tribe already believes.
We see
the impact of this move in our politics and the culture wars that divide
us. It shows up in climate change denial
and arguments about abortion and drugs and almost anything else you can
imagine. Anybody can find somebody who supports
their beliefs. Blaming this situation on
cultural relativism or postmodernism misses the point. We were always already ‘relativistic’ in our
views, we just used the centralized institutions of modernity to silence the
dissonance. That’s not possible
anymore. That is both a good thing and a
perplexing problem. How do we build a
decentralized and democratic space where we can engage with each other in a
civil and affirming manner?
More
than a few Sci Fi novels and movies have taken this problem and resolved it by
imagining a future dystopia where there is only one book and one mystery to
solve. This going back to the beginning
and starting over path is beyond brutal and unacceptable. It is futile to keep running out the same institutional
elites we’ve used in the past to solve this problem. We are at a critical point where we are
either going to make a collective jump in consciousness or we’re going to
perish. People have made these leaps
before – at the end of the Middle Ages – in the speculative philosophy of
Greece – and in other times and places where the old way of thinking broke
down. Our situation is all the more
intense because if we fail it won’t just be the end of one civilization, it
will be the end of civilization, period.
We are
going to have to revise our understanding of learning, education and
community. We don’t need centralized
institutions. We need to shift our focus
away from a single solution to multiple and iterative solutions, solutions that
work one person and one community at a time.
The only way to create this new consciousness is to work with each
person to help them reach the highest frame of consciousness they can
attain. The goal is to work past anger
and purification to create small and shifting alliances that can strengthen
over time. We have to revisit the idea
of what it means to be human and how we fit in the larger life system we’re a
part of. If you’re thinking that sounds way
too idealistic and spacey, consider the alternative. We have played ourselves into a position that
is as dire and desperate as any we have ever been in. Nothing we’ve already done will work
again. This work will be done face to
face, day to day. We’ll find out if
we’re up to the task. We’ll find out if
we have a future.
https://www.democracyatwork.info/eu_a_system_broken
ReplyDeleteI know you like me are interested in seeing the current corporate like structure of our enducation institutions change. I think the answer just may be democratizing the work space/institution . Hope you find the second half of this podcast informative.
Also, just the other day I was thinking about design. Recently I had listened to a interview with Luk Dunkurkwolfe ( Chief Of Design of Hyundai Genesis amd formerly Bently, Audi, Lamborghini). I was rather fascinated with how vast a knowledge Luk had concerning uniquely Korean aesthetics, asian philosophy, and perhaps most of all Context and how he applies all these and more to his design of vehicles and could so eloquently articulate all of these at the drop of a hat. Subsequently I thought of you and your deep understanding of context, able to draw so much from the ancient world, Renaissance etc. to give context in the modern world. I thought to myself I wish I could see the world around me through your lensne, so thanks for your insights Barry.
ReplyDelete