Extended Embodiment
One of
the features of a deep epistemology is that intelligence is ‘embodied,’ meaning
that it involves all of our senses and emotions and is not just a product of
the deracinated functions of we call our ‘mind.’ Deep epistemology always situates us within
our experience of the world instead of isolating the act of knowing from the
organism that experiences it. Embodiment
is a fairly well known concept and is frequently utilized to help overcome the
mind/body split that dominates and restricts much of Western philosophy. What I want to suggest is that we need to
extend our ideas about embodiment beyond our individual bodies and even beyond
our concepts of human consciousness.
What I’m proposing is an extended embodiment that recognizes that the
body, the source of experience and intelligence, is never just and individual
organism. We are autonomous and somewhat
unique, but we are not a singular entity.
As
Maturana makes clear, we are constructed by and connected to the world we bring
forth with other people through the human act of ‘ languaging.’ Only in contact with others are we able to
see meaning or value in they way we encounter and experience the material
world. That world does not impose its
‘beingness’ on us, we – and it is always a we – bring it into being and
consciousness by interacting with others.
For Maturana, this is never mere nominalism. He defines ‘languaging,’ as”the coordination
of coordinations of behaviors.” In other
words, ‘languaging’ is never just naming, it is always the coordination of
names and meanings with others in an attempt to share and shape our
experience. Thus, the body is always
already a construction we share with others.
Even in Des Carte’s meditations, he is never really there alone. He is always accompanied by the language of
his culture and the thoughts of previous philosophers. To have an embodied sense of intelligence is
inherently to have a social sense – a multiple bodied sense – of intelligence.
Our
bodies are in the world in ways that are not explicitly human. We construct a world through ‘languaging,’
but that world is not just a fantasy. We
are alive in a world that is also alive.
We are made of the same ‘stuff’ that it is made of, so if we have
consciousness, why doesn’t it?
Embodiment can’t be fully understood in human terms. It also has to account for the reality of the
rest of the living universe we inhabit.
This is not the same as transcendentalism, where there is a ‘human’
power or consciousness in nature. It is
a more fundamental realization that consciousness is greater and more diverse
than the more limited concept of human consciousness. Our bodies connect us to that sense of
consciousness. We are connected in the
awe we experience in nature. We are
connected in the love of puppies and the fear of sharks. We are connected to the vastness of
space. Embodiment that ignores these
connections to only concentrate on the technological or digital spaces we have
created is cut off from a critical source of experience and moral action.
Extended
embodiment is a grounding. It gives
depth and integrity to our experience.
It is a recognition of both the limitations and finality of our
existence and the limitless expressions of spirit that sustain us. Moral action and deep intelligence can never
originate in individual consciousness.
Every action, thought and word is connected to every other action,
thought and word. In Maturana’s way of
putting it, nothing is trivial. An
extended embodiment makes those connections and their consequences
manifest. It is the source of our sense
of rhythm, harmony and beauty. It is
greater than God. Without it, all of our
thoughts, creations and actions are in vain.
No comments:
Post a Comment